DrG's Medisense Feature Article
13101-Fish_Oil_Scare
Gluten
Intolerance – Fad or Reality?
By Ann Gerhardt, MD
February 2014
Print Version
Gluten
is a protein component of wheat and genetically-related grains, such as
barley and rye. For many people, these foods, especially the
whole grain forms, provide needed nutrients. In the last
decade a growing number of people have decided that they are
“gluten-sensitive” and feel better if they
eliminate it from their diet. Going gluten-free has become a
fad to which restaurants and food manufacturers have responded with
varying degrees of accommodation.
The only disease that physicians generally recognize as requiring
complete gluten avoidance is celiac disease, also known as non-tropical
sprue and gluten-sensitive enteropathy. Upon exposure to
gluten, sufferers make antibodies that attack and damage the small
intestinal lining. Making a celiac disease diagnosis requires
the presence of specific antibodies and evidence of pathologic changes
in the small intestinal lining. The latter assessment
requires a procedure in which a doctor passes a scope into the small
intestine and takes a small biopsy specimen.
Because the intestinal lining is required for food absorption, severe
disease leads to extreme diarrhea, wasting and malnutrition.
Less severe disease may cause bloating, loose stool or
constipation. In some people without diarrhea the first sign
is osteoporosis (thin bones), because poor calcium, vitamin D and
protein absorption impair bone growth. Since this disease
involves an immune response, even the tiniest amount of dietary gluten
will perpetuate antibody production and disease symptoms.
Once diagnosed, treatment requires cessation of gluten-containing
grains, as well any product that contains gluten as a thickener or
filler. The Celiac
Society’s website search tool identifies foods, condiments,
medicines and even toothpaste that contain gluten. Food
manufacturers’ response to the gluten-free fad, using
increasing numbers of gluten-free ingredients, has made it easier for
true celiac patients to eat.
What about people who don’t fulfil diagnostic criteria for
celiac disease? Are there other causes of gluten intolerance
that might justify the fad? Some irritable bowel syndrome
patients, with unexplained abdominal pain, bloating and bowel
disturbances, have antibodies suggestive of celiac disease, but no
small bowel abnormalities on biopsy. A gluten-free diet
improves symptoms in only some of these people. Other people
with the reverse pattern, abnormal intestinal lining similar to celiac
disease, but no antibodies, typically don’t respond to gluten
elimination.
Then there are those who have normal biopsies and no antibodies, but
say they feel better when they remove gluten from their
diets. These people describe improved abdominal symptoms
(less diarrhea, bloating, gas and pain,) as well as better energy,
concentration and neurological function upon eliminating
gluten.
They focus on gluten, but what they eliminate from their diets is
wheat, which might cause gastrointestinal symptoms for a number of
reasons unrelated to gluten. In addition to gluten and other
proteins, wheat products contain sugars and carbohydrates.
The human intestine is incapable of absorbing two of these sugars,
known as fructans and galactans. They pass through to the
colon where colonic bacteria ferment them to produce gas.
Think of the bubbles in a fermented beverage like beer and imagine all
those bubbles in your bowel. The churning and bloating may
feel uncomfortable.
Another cause of discomfort from carbohydrates and sugars is rapid
intestinal transit, in which the digestive process sweeps food quickly
through the intestine. With less time for sugars to be
absorbed, they end up in the colon. There bacteria ferment
them, producing gas, frequent or unpredictable stooling and discomfort.
“Carb addicts” eat bread, pasta, crackers and
pastry to the exclusion of other food groups and generally complain of
poor energy. Eliminating gluten from the diet boosts their
energy not because they are free from gluten, but because they often
lose weight and the new diet is usually more balanced and lower in
carbohydrate. Assuming wheat products aren’t
replaced by other carb-containing starches, they no longer experience
the fatigue associated with large carbohydrate loads.
Carbohydrates stimulate an insulin surge, inducing a shift in the brain
to nutrients that are converted to calming and sedating
substances. This might make you sleepy after
Thanksgiving dinner or fatigued all year long, depending on your
dietary carbohydrate pattern.
Diabetics and “pre-diabetics” have a different type
of carbohydrate and sugar intolerance. Since the body breaks
down wheat’s complex carbohydrates to sugar, diabetics should
limit these foods to control their blood sugar. Very high
blood sugar make people feel sluggish. People who are
“pre-diabetic” might oscillate between elevated and
very low blood sugars. The dips, called reactive
hypoglycemia, drain energy and cause lightheadedness and
tremulousness. With the obesity epidemic many more people
have “pre-diabetes” and reactive hypoglycemia, and
would feel better with carbohydrate (including wheat) restriction.
Yes, “gluten-free” has become a fad, but some
people truly feel better after adopting such a diet. Some could resume
eating a moderate amount of wheat products without health
problems. We don’t know all the mechanisms for
non-celiac gluten/wheat sensitivity.
I doubt that gluten is the real culprit in everyone who feels better
with wheat restriction. We need more research to make
progress in this area, but many health professionals and scientists are
skeptical that non-celiac gluten or wheat sensitivity even
exists. I hope that such skepticism doesn’t impede
progress in figuring it out.